August 2005


 

 

Home     About Us   Links     Photos     Archives    Contact Us

 

August 2005

 

Run For Wildlife

Love Thy Neighbour

To Pay Or Not To Pay?

The White Tribesmen

 

Regulars

 

Book Review

Wot's Happening

Other Events

Mazabuka Mumblings

Letter From Livingstone

The Humour of Melvin Durai

Readers Have Their Say

Small Ads

 

Home    

 

About Us  

 

Links    

 

Photos    

 

Archives   

 

Contact Us

Readers Have Their Say

That Cairo Road centre-isle trees are beautifying may be a lot of "codswallop" and "claptrap" (your comments in the July issue), it will take a lot more than trees to beautify Cairo Road - lest we forget, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, but ugly goes right to the bone.

I wrote a letter - published - to a local daily about the lack of a driving culture in Zambia compared to that prevailing in old towns of Europe, where a greater flow of traffic is experienced in narrow, winding, streets than the broad avenues of Lusaka. A driving culture is about driving maturity and respecting the rules of the road. Rules of the road evolved so that all drive in a way predictable to others, thus minimising misunderstandings and accidents.

We should eliminate obvious bad driving practices before condemning the Lusaka road network design.

In my opinion, the most common and greatest cause of traffic congestion in Lusaka are perceived to be:

a) not respecting the "right of way", compounded by;

b) being "kind to others" - a humanism week hangover?

c) double parking;

d) absence of "intelligent" road traffic signs i.e. give way, stop, keep left, no right turn, no u-turn, no parking, no access to heavy trucks, no trading etc.

Where are the Traffic Police when you need them? Probably busy with, so-called, "road blocks". How many times a day must a vehicle be checked as to whether its hooter, indicators, head-lights, windscreen wipers etc are functioning? How many times does an I.Q. need to be tested before being certified?

Suggestions:

- the City Council Roads dept., or whichever institution is responsible, should first of all place appropriate road traffic signs at all intersections and, repeatedly, along the length of roads;

- Traffic Police should place personnel (in randomly changing teams of 3, to reduce chances of unilaterally beneficial opportunities), at all such intersections to enforce the compliance of the Law. That would certainly make more economic sense than harassing motorists for petty vehicle malfunctionings;

- not allow heavy truck traffic in the town centre between 06.00 hrs and 19.00 hrs - this should also apply to Malambo Road;

- remove sidewalk traders (especially along Freedom Way), a major cause of traffic hindrance. Trading should be encouraged in appropriate locations in each residential areas, rather than the town centre;

- establish a vehicle clamping unit to clamp those vehicles hindering the smooth flow of traffic, as when double parked. The wardens responsible would be remunerated on a commission basis, payable each day from the takings. The administration management should be privatised and work to agreed daily targets.

- make Cha Cha Cha Road parking only on one side of the road, thereby gaining an extra lane;

- do away with the present subscribed parking lots and increase the parking fees - the longer one parks, exponentially higher the rate;

- create an extra lane, each way, by removing - yes, removing - the Cairo Road centre-isle. There would be sufficient width of isle remaining to place closely spaced giant pots (say, 1.5 m dia. and 2 m high) of mature, flowering, shrubs and bushes along the whole length of Cairo Road. The existing trees are an ungainly sight, regardless of the reason of their origin. I have vague memories of the days of the open drain.

J Liva

 

This is a motivational letter to vent my frustration about motivational letters. I am doing a consultancy for a large financial origination that provides many grants for the country and finances a large majority of the Foreign aid Organizations in Zambia.

One would think that a country which is desperate for financial aid and a private sector that battles to get loans would jump at the opportunity given half the chance. Maybe it explains why we are still stuck in the third world.

After spending three weeks trying to find an appropriate contact in the ministries, or a telephone number that actually works you have to speak to on average twenty people to find someone who has some small inkling as to what you are talking about, You are greeted with many yeses and promises and assurances from this person as long as you take the next step. The next step is to write a motivational letter to this person requesting the information you require. One takes a deep breath at this point and thinks, “AHH finally I am getting somewhere!!”

But no, that would be too easy, wouldn’t it.  You then wait two weeks for a reply, the reply being, “We do not have access to the information you required.” To which you make another phone  call to find out who does have access, and woe and behold the whole process starts again with someone else who does exactly the same thing. Even the ministers don’t have access to the information. Is this the ministry of health or the MI5?  Central statistics cant even you give you a complete copy of the 2001 census, in 2005. Eventually I gave up on the ministries and went to see COMESA, and some NGO’s who did not follow the ministries’ trend. They were helpful and obliging and assisted me with information quickly and efficiently, and to that avail I say thank you and it was a pleasure to work with you. 

“Yes!! No more dealing with ministries and the private sector part of the research won’t be half as bad. They are more efficient.”

That’s right, you guessed it - whoever taught that philosophy is wrong. Well wrong when it comes to Zambia anyway. My research started with the telecommunications networks in the private sector.  I dialed Celtel first, their reception number, and was patched through to the call center, only to be told to dial the number that I had just dialed to get through to reception.  This happened numerous times before I lost my cool, explaining to them that number you are giving me is the number I have been dialing and can someone please assist with the correct number. Four supervisors later and an explanation why and I am through to the reception. Where once again the whole processes that the ministries proscribed as standard treatment of someone offering help applied, Speak to twenty people, write a motivational letter and we will then tell you, “We are unable to assist you.”

Telecel was next, the reception answered only after a couple of “all trunks are busy now please try your call again later.”

Me: Good morning my name is frustrated consultant and I work for big money, I am doing research on the telecommunication sectors in order to facilitate some grants to better the communication systems in this country, can I please talk to Mr XXX in your research department.

Telecel Receptionist: In order to speak to Mr. XXX in the research department you have to write a motivational letter explaining why you want to speak him.

Me: Thank you very much goodbye.

This appears to be the latest and most efficient way of Zambian Government and indeed the private sector ensuring that nothing is done. My advice is not to ask questions when banks turn down loans or government agencies that come looking for foreign aid money are turned away. They don’t do it because they don’t want to have to write a motivational letter in order to help someone out. As far as I can see the motivational letter should come from the organization looking for help, not the other way around.

This will be the last motivational letter I write.

Frustrated Consultant

 

I regret that having been under hibernation due to weather I missed some of the issues including your April 2005 issue. Having read the nice historical article, Bridging The Falls, I desire to comment briefly.

While the article gives credit for the design of the Victoria Falls Bridge to Hobson and Freeman, other writers give it to Sir Douglas Fox (vide Mosi-oa-Tunya : A Handbook to the Victoria Falls, ed. DW Phillipson, p97). And while confirming 12 September 1905 as the official opening day,
Phillipson (p98) and the Central African Post (July 10, 1952) speak of Prof. Darwin officiating, not Miss Pauling!

And who was Harold Pauling? If this be the railway contractor, what about George Pauling mentioned by Phillipson (p97) and LH Gann in his book A History of Northern Rhodesia (p126)? By the way, Sapele Road, that runs past the old Lusaka Railway station (or Commuter Station or CR Bus Station) was originally named Pauling Road after George Pauling. Can the Railway Museum reconcile these, please

Yuyi K Libakeni

‘The Cape To Cairo Railway’ by George Tabor names Hobson and Freeman as the designers of the steel arch.  Various other sources, including the American Society of Civil Engineers name Freeman as the designer. Freeman was employed by Douglas Fox and Partners. According to these sources, Freeman eventually became a senior partner in this firm which was renamed Freeman, Fox and Partners in 1938. Perhaps the Railway Museum can shed more light on this. Harold Pauling was the cousin of George Pauling. He, together with his brothers, Henry, Willie and Percy and George’s brother, Harry, joined forces under the company, Pauling and Co. It was said that one or another Pauling was responsible for almost the entire railway line between the Cape and the Congo.